From b16a3279bf74b25ca93c53b21e235a4414d630dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Guschin <saintruler@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 21:33:53 +0400
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=9D=D0=B0=D1=87=D0=B0=D0=BB=20=D0=BF=D1=80=D0=B5?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=B7=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D0=B0=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=8E=20=D0=BF=D0=BE?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=20=D0=B4=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=88=D0=BD=D0=B5=D0=BC=D1=83=20?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D1=87=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8E=20=D0=BF=D0=BE=20=D0=90?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=BD=D0=B3=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B9=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BC=D1=83=20?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=AF=D0=B7=D1=8B=D0=BA=D1=83?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex

(limited to 'english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex')

diff --git a/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex b/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..33531a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+\documentclass{beamer}
+\usetheme{}
+
+\title{``Computing Machinery and Intelligence'' by A.~M.~Turing}
+\subtitle{Home reading, 5th semester}
+\author{Andrew Guschin}
+\date{\today}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{About author}
+  
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{Summary of article}
+  
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The definitions might be framed so as to reflect so far as possible
+  the normal use of the words, but this attitude is dangerous, If the
+  meaning of the words "machine" and "think" are to be found by
+  examining how they are commonly used it is difficult to escape the
+  conclusion that the meaning and the answer to the question, "Can
+  machines think?" is to be sought in a statistical survey such as a
+  Gallup poll.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- We are the more ready to do so in view of the fact that the present
+  interest in "thinking machines" has been aroused by a particular
+  kind of machine, usually called an "electronic computer" or "digital
+  computer."
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- If we use the above explanation as a definition we shall be in
+  danger of circularity of argument.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- For instance in considering the switches for a lighting system it is
+  a convenient fiction that each switch must be definitely on or
+  definitely off.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The popular view that scientists proceed inexorably from
+  well-established fact to well-established fact, never being
+  influenced by any improved conjecture, is quite mistaken.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- It is admitted that there are certain things that He cannot do such
+  as making one equal to two, but should we not believe that He has
+  freedom to confer a soul on an elephant if He sees fit?
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- We like to believe that Man is in some subtle way superior to the
+  rest of creation.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I
+  believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are
+  particularly subject.
+\end{frame}
+
+\end{document}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

