From c75e272729bc4fc126f4eae337d1da60d8c24c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Guschin <guschin.drew@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 14:42:12 +0400
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=94=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=BB=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=B5=20=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BA=D1=81=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=B2=20=D0=BF?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=BE=20=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B3=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=B9=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=BE?=
 =?UTF-8?q?=D0=BC=D1=83=20=D1=8F=D0=B7=D1=8B=D0=BA=D1=83?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex | 169 --------------------------
 1 file changed, 169 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex

(limited to 'english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex')

diff --git a/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex b/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
deleted file mode 100644
index 801e741..0000000
--- a/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
-\documentclass{beamer}
-
-\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}
-\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
-\usepackage{tempora}
-
-\usepackage[russian]{babel}
-\inputencoding{utf8}
-
-\usetheme{Madrid}
-
-\title{``Computing Machinery and Intelligence'' by A.~M.~Turing}
-\subtitle{Home reading, 5th semester}
-\author{Andrew Guschin}
-\date{\today}
-
-\begin{document}
-\maketitle
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \frametitle{About author}
-
-  Alan Turing was an English mathematician and computer scientist. He
-  was very influential in development of theoretical computer sciences
-  and is widely considered to be the father of artificial intelligence.
-
-  The paper named in the title considered seminal in the field of
-  artificial intelligence. It was published in 1950 in academic journal
-  ``Mind'' by Oxford University Press, where it first introduced the
-  concept now known as ``Turing Test'' to general public.
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \frametitle{Summary of paper}
-
-  In this paper Turing considers question ``Can machines think?'' as
-  wrong and proposes the new form of this problem. This new question
-  in terms of the ``imitation game''.
-
-  This game played with three people: man, woman and
-  interrogator. Interrogator stays in separate room from others. His
-  goal is to determine which of the other two is man and which is
-  woman. If we replace one of people with machine, Turing believed
-  that we can replace the original question with ``Will interrogator
-  decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as he does
-  when the game is played between man and woman?''.
-
-  In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major
-  objections to the proposition that ``machines can think''.
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    The definitions might be framed so as to reflect so far as
-    possible the normal use of the words, but this attitude is
-    dangerous. If the meaning of the words ``machine'' and ``think''
-    are to be found by examining how they are commonly used it is
-    difficult to escape the conclusion that the meaning and the answer
-    to the question, ``Can machines think?'' is to be sought in a
-    statistical survey such as a Gallup poll.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Определение может быть сформулировано таким образом, чтобы
-    отражать повседневное значение этих слов, однако подобный способ
-    таит в себе опасности. Если определять значение слов ``машина'' и
-    ``мыслить'' в соответствии с употреблением этих слов в обиходе,
-    трудно будет избежать вывода о том, что ответ на вопрос: ``Может
-    ли машина мыслить?'' следует искать в данных статистических
-    исследований, вроде опросов Гэллапа.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    We are the more ready to do so in view of the fact that the
-    present interest in ``thinking machines'' has been aroused by a
-    particular kind of machine, usually called an ``electronic
-    computer'' or ``digital computer.''
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Мы более склонны так сделать с учётом того, что наш интерес в
-    ``думающих машинах'' был вызван машиной определённого рода, обычно
-    называемой ``электронным компьютером'' или ``цифровым
-    компьютером''.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    If we use the above explanation as a definition we shall be in
-    danger of \textbf{circularity of argument}.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Если принять данное выше объяснение за определение, то мы рискуем
-    прийти к \textbf{круговому объяснению}.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    For instance in considering the switches for a lighting system it is a
-    \textbf{convenient fiction} that each switch must be definitely on or
-    definitely off.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Например, рассматривая переключатели света, \textbf{удобно считать}, что
-    каждый из переключателей может быть либо точно выключен, либо точно включён.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    The popular view that scientists proceed \textbf{inexorably} from
-    well-established fact to well-established fact, never being influenced by
-    any improved conjecture, is quite mistaken.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Распространённое мнение, что учёные \textbf{не раздумывая} переходят от
-    одного хорошо установленного факта к другому, никогда не основываясь на
-    каком-то неподтверждённом предположении, в корне неверно.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    It is admitted that there are certain things that He cannot do such as
-    making one equal to two, but should we not believe that He has freedom
-    \textbf{to confer a soul} on an elephant if He sees fit?
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Признано, что существуют некоторые вещи, которые Бог не способен выполнить,
-    например сделать единицу равной двум, но можем ли мы не верить в то, что Бог
-    способен \textbf{даровать душу} слону, если Он посчитает нужным.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    We like to believe that Man is in some subtle way superior to \textbf{the
-    rest of creation}.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Нам нравится верить в то, что Человек в некоторой степени находится выше
-    \textbf{всей остальной природы}.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}
-  \begin{block}{}
-    The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I
-    believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are
-    particularly subject.
-  \end{block}
-  \onslide<2->
-  \begin{block}{}
-    Мнение о том, что машины не способны удивить основано на, как мне
-    кажется, заблуждении, которому особенно подвержены математики и
-    философы.
-  \end{block}
-\end{frame}
-
-\end{document}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

