summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/english/homereading-sem5
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Guschin <saintruler@gmail.com>2021-12-12 21:33:53 +0400
committerAndrew Guschin <saintruler@gmail.com>2021-12-12 21:33:53 +0400
commitb16a3279bf74b25ca93c53b21e235a4414d630dd (patch)
treedc14a4848bb1ed1e5a48489e7541ebd91c5646f7 /english/homereading-sem5
parentd9a796eb1c17d2c84c222ade96a9c96ec7734fef (diff)
Начал презентацию по домашнему чтению по Английскому Языку
Diffstat (limited to 'english/homereading-sem5')
-rw-r--r--english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex72
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex b/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..33531a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/english/homereading-sem5/homereading-sem5.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+\documentclass{beamer}
+\usetheme{}
+
+\title{``Computing Machinery and Intelligence'' by A.~M.~Turing}
+\subtitle{Home reading, 5th semester}
+\author{Andrew Guschin}
+\date{\today}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{About author}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Summary of article}
+
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The definitions might be framed so as to reflect so far as possible
+ the normal use of the words, but this attitude is dangerous, If the
+ meaning of the words "machine" and "think" are to be found by
+ examining how they are commonly used it is difficult to escape the
+ conclusion that the meaning and the answer to the question, "Can
+ machines think?" is to be sought in a statistical survey such as a
+ Gallup poll.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- We are the more ready to do so in view of the fact that the present
+ interest in "thinking machines" has been aroused by a particular
+ kind of machine, usually called an "electronic computer" or "digital
+ computer."
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- If we use the above explanation as a definition we shall be in
+ danger of circularity of argument.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- For instance in considering the switches for a lighting system it is
+ a convenient fiction that each switch must be definitely on or
+ definitely off.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The popular view that scientists proceed inexorably from
+ well-established fact to well-established fact, never being
+ influenced by any improved conjecture, is quite mistaken.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- It is admitted that there are certain things that He cannot do such
+ as making one equal to two, but should we not believe that He has
+ freedom to confer a soul on an elephant if He sees fit?
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- We like to believe that Man is in some subtle way superior to the
+ rest of creation.
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+- The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I
+ believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are
+ particularly subject.
+\end{frame}
+
+\end{document}